Today’s Between 
Master and Disciples – 
“Socrates on 
‘Pleasure and Temperance’ 
and ‘Of the Worth 
and Value of Friends’” – 
will be presented in Greek 
with subtitles in Arabic, 
Aulacese (Vietnamese), 
Bulgarian, Chinese, 
Czech-Slovak, English, 
French, German, 
Hindi, Hungarian, 
Indonesian, Italian, 
Japanese, Korean, 
Malay, Mongolian, 
Persian, Polish, 
Portuguese, Punjabi, 
Russian, Spanish, 
and Thai.
Ancient Greece. 
This was an influential 
period of time 
in Greek history 
which has provided 
the foundation 
of Western Civilization 
through its language, 
educational systems, 
philosophy, politics, 
arts, and science.  
Around 469 BC, 
Socrates was born 
in Athens, Greece. 
Many people consider 
him to be the father 
of Western philosophy. 
Others think of Socrates 
as an insightful teacher 
and an enlightened Master.  
Most of the information 
about Socrates, his life 
and his philosophy, 
was transcribed 
after his death 
by two of his students, 
Plato and Xenophon. 
These disciples wrote several books
about their Master 
in which 
Socrates is depicted 
as the main character. 
From these books, 
we are acquainted 
with Socrates’ teachings. 
He believed 
that an individual’s 
main purpose on Earth is 
to discover the Truth.  
He stated that most 
people focus their lives 
around their families, 
careers, and social 
responsibilities, 
when, in fact, 
they should be concerned 
about the welfare 
of their souls. 
With compassion 
for all life, Socrates 
followed and promoted 
a vegetarian, meaning 
animal free, diet.
Today, we present to you
Socrates’ philosophy titled
“Socrates on 
‘Pleasure and Temperance’ 
and ‘Of the Worth 
and Value of Friends’”
from Xenophon’s book,
“The Memorable Thoughts
of Socrates.”
Thank you for joining us 
for today’s episode of
Between Master
and Disciples 
on Supreme Master 
Television.
Join us again 
Thursday, September 30, for for part 2 
of Socrates’ philosophy 
on pleasure, temperance,
and friendship.
Coming up next is 
Animal World:
Our Co-Inhabitants, right
after Noteworthy News.
May Heavens
grace your life 
with light and love!
Thank you, 
gracious viewers, 
for your company 
for today’s episode of
Between Master ##and Disciples. 
Please stay tuned to 
Supreme Master Television 
for Animal World: 
Our Co-Inhabitants,
coming up next, right 
after Noteworthy News. 
We wish you 
much joy and abundance 
in your life. 
A CONFERENCE 
OF SOCRATES 
WITH ARISTIPPUS 
CONCERNING 
PLEASURE 
AND TEMPERANCE.
He encouraged his hearers 
by the following 
arguments to 
support hunger and thirst, 
to resist the temptations 
of love, 
to fly from laziness,
and inure themselves 
to all manner of fatigues.  
For, being told 
that one of them 
lived too luxuriously, 
he asked him this question: 
"If you were entrusted, 
Aristippus, 
with the education 
of two young men, 
one to be a prince and 
the other a private man, 
how would you 
educate them?  
Let us begin with 
their nourishment, as being 
the foundation of all."   
"It is true," said Aristippus, 
"that nourishment is 
the foundation of our life, 
for a man must soon die 
if he be not nourished."  
"You would accustom 
both of them," 
said Socrates, "to eat and 
drink at a certain hour?"  
"It is likely I should?"  
"But which of the two," 
said Socrates, 
"would you teach 
to leave eating 
before he was satisfied, 
to go about 
some earnest business?"  
"Him, without doubt," 
answered Aristippus, 
"whom I intended to 
render capable to govern, 
to the end that under him 
the affairs of the Republic 
might not suffer by delay."  
"Which of the two," 
continued Socrates, 
"would you teach 
to abstain from drinking 
when he was thirsty, 
to sleep but little, 
to go late to bed, 
to rise early, 
to watch whole nights, 
to live chastely, 
to get the better of 
his favorite inclinations, 
and not to avoid fatigues, 
but expose himself freely 
to them?"  
"The same still," 
replied Aristippus.  
"And if there be any art 
that teaches 
to overcome our enemies, 
to which of the two 
is it rather reasonable 
to teach it?"  
"To him to," 
said Aristippus, 
"for without that art 
all the rest would 
avail him nothing."  
"I believe," said Socrates, 
"that a man, 
who has been educated 
in this manner, 
would not suffer himself 
to be so easily surprised 
by his enemies….” 
"You say true," 
said Aristippus.  
"Well, then," 
pursued Socrates, "
…does not this happen 
to adulterers, who skulk 
and hide themselves in 
the chambers and closets 
of married women, 
though they know 
they run a very great risk, 
and that the laws are 
very strict and rigorous 
against those crimes?  
They know themselves 
to be watched, and that, 
if they are taken, 
they shall not be let go 
with impunity.  
In a word, 
they see punishment 
and infamy hanging over 
the heads of criminals 
like themselves.  
Besides, 
they are not ignorant, 
that there are a thousand 
honorable diversions 
to deliver them from 
those infamous passions, 
and yet they run 
hand over head into 
the midst of these dangers, 
and what is this but to be 
wretched and desperate 
to the highest degree?"  
"I think it so," 
answered Aristippus.  
"What say you to this," 
continued Socrates, 
"that the most necessary 
and most important affairs 
of life… are, with others 
of little less consequence, 
performed in the fields 
and in the open air, 
and that the greatest part 
of mankind accustom 
themselves so little 
to endure the inclemency 
of the seasons, 
to suffer heat and cold?  
Is not this a great neglect? 
and do you not think 
that a man who is 
to command others 
ought to inure himself 
to all these hardships?"  
"I think he ought," 
answered Aristippus.  
"Therefore," 
replied Socrates, 
"if they who are patient 
and laborious, 
as we have said, 
are worthy to command, 
may we not say that 
they who can do nothing 
of all this, ought never 
to pretend to any office?"  
Aristippus agreed to it, 
and Socrates went on. 
"Since then you know 
the rank which either 
of these two sorts of men 
ought to hold, 
amongst which would you 
have us place you?"  
"Me!" said Aristippus; 
"why truly, not amongst 
those that govern; 
for that is an office 
I would never choose.  
Let those rule 
who have a mind for it; 
for my part, 
I envy not their condition.  
For, when I reflect that 
we find it hard enough 
to supply our own wants, 
I do not approve of 
loading ourselves, besides, 
with the necessities 
of a whole people; 
and that being 
often compelled to go
without many things 
that we desire, we should 
engage ourselves 
in an employment 
that would render us 
liable to blame, 
if we did not take care 
to supply others 
with everything they want: 
I think 
there is folly in all this.  
For republics make use 
of their magistrates 
as I do of my servants, 
who shall get me 
my food and drink, 
and all other necessaries, 
as I command, 
and not presume to touch 
any of it themselves; 
so, too, the people 
will have those, 
who govern the State, 
take care to provide them 
with plenty of all things, 
and will not suffer them 
to do anything 
for their own advantage.  
I think, therefore, 
that all who are pleased 
with a hurry of affairs, 
and in creating business 
for others, 
are most fit to govern, 
provided they have been 
educated and instructed 
in the manner 
we mentioned.  
But, for my part, I desire 
to lead a more quiet 
and easy life."
"Let us," said Socrates, 
"consider 
whether they who govern 
lead more happy lives 
than their subjects: 
among the nations 
that are known to us 
in Asia, the Syrians, 
the Phrygians, 
and the Lydians, 
are under the empire 
of the Persians.  
In Europe, 
the Maeotians are 
subject to the Scythians; 
in Africa, 
the Carthaginians reign 
over the rest of the Africans.  
Which now, 
in your opinion, 
are the most happy?  
Let us look into Greece, 
where you are at present.  
Whose condition, think you, 
is most to be desired, 
that of the nations who rule, 
or of the people who 
are under the dominion 
of others?"  
"I can never," 
said Aristippus, 
"consent to be a slave; 
but there is a way 
between both that leads 
neither to empire 
nor subjection, 
and this is the road 
of liberty, in which
I endeavor to walk, 
because it is the shortest 
to arrive at true quiet 
and repose."  
"If you had said," 
replied Socrates, 
"that this way, which 
leads neither to empire 
nor subjection, 
is a way that leads far 
from all human society, 
you would, perhaps, 
have said something; 
for, how can we live 
among men, 
and neither command 
nor obey?  
Do you not observe 
that the mighty 
oppress the weak, and 
use them as their slaves, 
after they have 
made them groan under 
the weight of oppression, 
and given them just cause 
to complain 
of their cruel usage, 
in a thousand instances, 
both general and particular?  
And if they find any 
who will not submit 
to the yoke, 
they ravage their countries, 
spoil their corn, 
cut down their trees, 
and attack them, in short, 
in such a manner 
that they are compelled 
to yield themselves 
up to slavery, rather than 
undergo so unequal a war?  
Among private men 
themselves, do not the 
stronger and more bold 
trample on the weaker?"  
"To the end, therefore, 
that this may not happen 
to me," said Aristippus, 
"I confine myself 
not to any republic, 
but am sometimes here, 
sometimes there, 
and think it best to be 
a stranger wherever I am."  
"This invention of yours," 
replied Socrates, 
"is very extraordinary.  
Travelers, I believe, are 
not now so much infested 
on the roads by robbers 
as formerly, deterred, 
I suppose, 
by the fate of Sinnis, 
Scyron, Procrustes, 
and the rest of that gang.  
What then?  
They who are settled 
in their own country, 
and are concerned 
in the administration 
of the public affairs, 
they have the laws 
in their favors, have 
their relations and friends 
to assist them, 
have fortified towns…
for their defense: 
over and above, 
they have alliances 
with their neighbors: 
and yet all these 
favorable circumstances 
cannot entirely shelter them 
from the attempts and 
surprises of wicked men.  
But can you, who have 
none of these advantages, 
who are, for the most part, 
travelling on the roads, 
often dangerous 
to most men, 
who never enter a town, 
where you have not 
less credit than 
the meanest inhabitant, 
and are as obscure 
as the wretches who prey 
on the properties of others; 
in these circumstances, 
can you, I say, 
expect to be safe, merely 
because you are a stranger, 
or perhaps have got 
passports from the States 
that promise you 
all manner of safety 
coming or going, 
or should it be 
your hard fortune 
to be made a slave, 
you would make 
such a bad one, 
that a master would be 
never the better for you?  
For, who would suffer 
in his family a man 
who would not work, and 
yet expected to live well?  
But let us see how masters 
use such servants....
If they are thieves, 
they prevent them 
from stealing, 
by carefully locking up 
whatever they could take: 
they chain them for fear 
they should run away: 
if they are dull and lazy, 
then stripes and scourges 
are the rewards 
we give them.  
If you yourself, my friend, 
had a worthless slave, 
would you not take 
the same measures 
with him?"  
"I would treat 
such a fellow," 
answered Aristippus, 
"with all manner 
of severity, 
till I had brought him 
to serve me better.  
But, Socrates, let us resume 
our former discourse. 
In what do they 
who are educated 
in the art of government, 
which you seem to think 
a great happiness, 
differ from those who 
suffer through necessity?  
For you say they must 
accustom themselves 
to hunger and thirst, 
to endure cold and heat, 
to sleep little, and 
that they must voluntarily 
expose themselves 
to a thousand other 
fatigues and hardships. 
Now, I cannot conceive 
what difference there is 
between being whipped 
willingly and by force, 
and tormenting one's body 
either one way 
or the other, except that 
it is a folly in a man to be 
willing to suffer pain."
"How," said Socrates, 
"you know not 
this difference 
between things voluntary 
and constrained, 
that he who suffers hunger 
because he is pleased 
to do so may likewise eat 
when he has a mind; 
and he who suffers thirst 
because he is willing 
may also drink 
when he pleases.  
But it is not in the power 
of him who suffers 
either of them through 
constraint and necessity 
to relieve himself 
by eating and drinking 
the moment he desires it?  
Besides, he that 
voluntarily embraceth 
any laborious exercise 
finds much comfort 
and content in the hope 
that animates him….  
And yet what they take, 
though they think it 
a reward for all their toil, 
is certainly 
of very little value.  
Ought not they, then, 
who labor to gain 
the friendship of good men, 
or to overcome 
their enemies, 
or to render themselves 
capable of governing 
their families, and 
of serving their country, 
ought not these, 
I say, joyfully 
to undertake the trouble, 
and to rest content, 
conscious of 
the inward approbation 
of their own minds, and 
the regard and esteem 
of the virtuous?  
And to convince you 
that it is good to impose 
labors on ourselves, 
it is a maxim among those 
who instruct youth 
that the exercises 
which are easily performed 
at the first attempt, and 
which we immediately 
take delight in, 
are not capable 
to form the body 
to that vigor and strength 
that is requisite 
in great undertakings, nor 
of imprinting in the soul 
any considerable knowledge: 
but that those 
which require patience, 
application, labor, and 
assiduity, prepare the way 
to illustrious actions 
and great achievements.