Astute viewers, 
welcome to Planet Earth: 
Our Loving Home 
on Supreme Master 
Television. 
This week we’ll find out 
about the hugely damaging 
environmental impact 
of climate change with 
Dr. Donald J. Wuebbles, 
Harry E. Preble Endowed 
Professor 
in the Departments 
of Atmospheric Sciences 
and Electrical and 
Computer Engineering at 
the University of Illinois 
at Urbana-Champaign, USA. 
Dr. Wuebbles has a PhD 
in Atmospheric Sciences 
from the University of 
California – Davis, USA 
and has authored over 
400 scientific articles, 
most of which 
concern our planet’s 
atmospheric composition 
and its effects on 
the global climate system. 
He is noted 
as the first scientist 
to statistically prove 
that stratospheric ozone 
was depleting 
in the early 1980’s 
and was honored 
by the United States 
Environmental Protection 
Agency in 2005 with 
the Stratospheric Ozone 
Protection Award 
for his overall work 
in this area. 
Dr. Wuebbles 
was a lead author 
on the first and second 
assessment reports 
by the United Nations 
Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change (IPCC) 
and shares in the 2007 
Nobel Prize for his work 
with the Panel.
We know that 
the climate is changing, 
that it’s not just 
the Earth is warming; 
it’s many other aspects 
that are going on; 
precipitation patterns 
are changing 
and other aspects and 
we have clear evidence 
that the basis 
for those changes is 
because of human activities 
and particularly 
the emissions 
of carbon dioxide 
and some other gases 
and particles 
that are in the atmosphere 
that are causing a forcing 
on the climate system 
that is driving that change.
One serious outcome of 
rising global temperatures 
is an increase 
in the frequency 
and strength of 
extreme weather events 
such as hurricanes, floods 
and droughts.
Well, this year (2011), 
actually, was 
the worst year on record 
for natural disasters 
in the U.S. – over 
US$35-billion of damages. 
Some of that was 
due to hurricanes 
and earthquakes 
and things like that. 
But a good part of it was 
because of major storms 
that occurred, 
causing flooding; 
for example, 
the Midwest and the South, 
near the Mississippi and 
other, associated rivers, 
wildfires occurring 
in the Southwest related 
to large temperatures 
that were occurring 
and a number of 
other such things. 
What we’re thinking is, 
unfortunately, that kind of 
uncommon event is likely 
to become more common 
in the future as we look 
at the changing climate. 
We really expect increases 
in the severe weather 
as a result 
of climate change and 
that’s what we’re seeing. 
Every part of the US 
has seen an increase 
over the last 50 years.
In the Midwest, that’s been 
over a 30% increase 
in the top 1% of storms, 
so more precipitation 
is coming.
Well, that means more 
flooding; in particular, 
it’s tending 
to come that way 
in the winter and spring, 
so more flooding. 
And what we’re seeing 
also in areas that aren’t 
getting those increases 
overall in precipitation 
like we’re seeing 
in the Midwest, 
if we go to the Southwest, 
for example, 
when they do get rain, 
it still tends 
to come as larger events 
than it used to, 
but they’re not getting 
as much rain 
as they were before. 
And so that’s why 
in Texas (USA) this year 
we had a really 
major problem with 
a really major drought.
The public typically 
associates climate change 
with unnaturally 
hot weather, but it can 
also lead to very harsh, 
abnormally cold weather 
in certain regions as well. 
The substantial warming 
occurring in the Arctic 
is materially changing 
the weather patterns 
in other parts of the world.
So we expect more warming 
in higher latitudes 
because of several 
important feedback 
processes that occur 
in the climate system. 
One is called 
the Ice-Albedo Feedback. 
What that means is as 
the ice in the Arctic melts 
you have less ice on land 
or less ice in the ocean. 
The background, 
what was covered with ice 
has less reflectivity. 
And that causes 
more absorption 
of sunlight and you get 
warmer temperatures. 
So what does that do? 
Because 
the temperature gradient 
between the Arctic 
and mid-latitudes 
is decreasing, the jet stream 
becomes weaker. 
And the net result is 
that large what we call 
“extra-tropical storms” 
are moving further 
northward. 
And that’s tending 
to leave places like Texas 
(USA) and the Southwest 
and Southeast drier 
and so more likely to have 
a drought than before. 
But it’s also 
part of the reason 
why we’re seeing this 
increased precipitation 
in our area (the Midwest).
At the same time, 
the other key factor there 
is that you can get 
more Arctic air coming 
down to mid-latitudes. 
And so in the winter, 
you can actually end up 
with colder temperatures 
for short periods 
compared to what you 
would have had previously. 
So you can end up 
with a large snowstorm 
that can drop 36 inches 
of snow 
in Washington DC (USA) 
and actually have that 
relate very strongly 
to our changing climate. 
Shifts away from 
normal weather patterns 
also have detrimental 
effects on human 
and animal health; 
one reason for this is 
that certain diseases that 
rely on vectors or hosts 
spread as 
suitable environments 
for the hosts enlarge. 
For example, malaria, 
which is transmitted by 
the Anopheles mosquito, 
is mainly confined 
to tropical areas, 
but as the world warms, 
more regions will provide 
suitable conditions 
for the mosquito to thrive, 
thus causing 
marked increases 
in malarial infections. 
The Wildlife 
Conservation Society 
has identified 12 diseases 
that are likely 
to spread to other areas 
due to climate change, 
including bird flu, 
cholera, plague, Ebola, 
tuberculosis, Lyme disease 
and babesiosis. 
However, increased 
incidence of disease 
is not the only 
climate-change-induced 
factor that will 
significantly affect 
human health. 
Water and food shortages 
and more dust storms 
will also have 
a tremendously negative 
impact on our longevity 
and quality of life.
One of the things 
that I have a particular 
concern about is pollens. 
I have allergies; 
many, many Americans 
have allergies to pollen. 
And as the climate 
is warming, 
as the weather patterns 
are changing, we’re tending 
to get more weeds. 
More weeds means 
more pollen, and 
so more concerns about 
those kinds of allergies 
than we had before. 
In addition, 
as the climate changes, 
we expect more issues 
with air quality. 
The same amount 
of emissions that lead to 
concerns about ozone 
are actually exacerbated 
or made worse 
by warmer temperatures. 
We expect that as 
the temperature’s warming, 
we’re more likely 
to have pathogens 
and insects and things 
that can cause major, 
major health problems 
all come into a region 
that maybe 
you didn’t see before. 
So there’s a wide range 
of possible impacts 
on human health as a result 
of the change in climate. 
The economic cost 
of a hotter planet 
is also predicted 
to be extremely large; 
a 2005 study 
by Claudia Kemfert 
of the German Institute 
for Economic Research 
estimated that 
climate change will cost 
up to US$20 trillion 
by 2100. 
However, another figure 
calculated by 
British scientists for the 
European Commission's 
Directorate General 
for the Environment 
put the sum at 
US$73 trillion by 2200.
A report for 
the British Government 
by the World Bank’s 
former chief economist 
and past advisor 
to the UK government 
Lord Nicholas Stern 
states that inaction 
on climate change 
will substantially reduce 
the world’s economic 
output by the end 
of the current century.
There have been a number 
of statements put out 
that the cost of inaction 
is far greater 
than the cost of action. 
And it is much better 
to do something now 
than wait because of 
the extreme expense. 
One analysis 
by a number of 
top economists 
was led by Lord Stern 
from the UK. 
And in that analysis, 
they said that 
we may have as much as 
a 20% decrease in 
the gross domestic product 
worldwide 
by the end of the century 
if climate change continues 
to occur at the rate it is, 
if we don’t do anything 
about the burning 
of fossil fuels, etc. 
So that would be 
a dramatic impact on 
the economics, affecting 
everyone on Earth. 
Another report 
by the Netherlands 
Environmental 
Assessment Agency, 
entitled 
“Climate Benefits 
of Changing Diet,” states 
that a planetary shift 
to a completely 
plant-based diet 
would result in 
an 80% reduction 
in the costs of mitigating 
global warming by 2050, 
because producing 
animal products 
is extremely intensive 
in terms of energy use 
and emits very harmful 
greenhouse-gases. 
Many of these gases 
such as methane and 
nitrous oxide generated 
in the process of raising 
factory-farmed animals 
have global warming 
potentials far larger than 
that of carbon dioxide. 
For example, 
over a 20-year period, 
methane is 72-times more
potent than carbon dioxide 
at warming the Earth 
and if aerosol interactions 
are considered, 
the gas is actually 
100 times more potent; 
however it is shorter-lived 
compared to 
carbon dioxide. 
Methane stores 
in the atmosphere 
for 10 years, which means 
that after you emit 
a certain amount 
of methane, 10 years later 
you can expect 
a little over 60% of that, 
maybe almost 
two-thirds of that gas 
has been removed 
from the atmosphere 
through reaction. 
And then the rest 
stays there for 
another 10-year period. 
And you reduce another 
60-plus percent of that 
and then, 
nitrous oxide's even longer. 
It's like a hundred years. 
(CO2 has an initial lifetime
of a hundred years. 
But then after that, 
it depends on the rate 
of the CO2 being removed 
into the deep ocean. 
So the second lifetime, 
second e-folding rate, 
we call it, 
would be maybe more like 
a thousand years. 
So, CO2, once we emit it, 
stays around 
for a long, long time. 
No question about 
the importance of methane 
and nitrous oxide 
and some other gases 
in terms of their effects 
on climate and 
are very much a concern.
 
What do think about 
the government 
shifting subsidies away 
from livestock and toward 
organic vegan farming 
as an effective and 
even money-saving policy 
to help reduce 
global warming? 
I think anything we can do 
towards promoting going 
vegetarian and vegan 
would be really good. 
As a scientist, I don’t tend 
to talk about policy 
and say well we should 
be doing specific things 
with policy. 
But certainly, 
I think the science tells us 
that we could help 
with these concerns 
about sustainability 
and climate concerns 
by reducing our use of 
meat and animal products, 
so we should be 
looking at ways 
we could do that effectively. 
Thank you 
Dr. Donald J. Wuebbles 
for taking time 
from your busy schedule 
to talk about the effects 
of climate change 
on our world and for your 
important scientific work 
in this field over the years. 
May enjoy 
continued success in your 
future research endeavors.
For more information 
on Dr. Wuebbles, 
please visit 
www.Atmos.Illinois.edu/people/wuebbles.html 
Conscientious viewers, 
thank you for watching 
this week’s episode of 
Planet Earth: 
Our Loving Home. 
May we always respect 
and protect our 
beautiful planetary abode.