The Arctic Ocean surrounds with its freezing, icy waters the northern
edges of Europe, Asia and America It shows up from a satellite as a
bright snowcap on our Planet Earth, covered by a thick layer of snow and
sea-ice.
It had long been a dream to use the Arctic sea waters as a short-cut
between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, at least during the short
summer season.
In 1906, Roald Amundsen established himself as a sailor and explorer
when he took a 70-foot boat through the entire length of the Northwest
Passage The journey led from the North Atlantic through the Canadian
Arctic Archipelago, then along the northern coast of North America,
reaching the Pacific Ocean at the Bering Strait after a 3 years' long
voyage, most of the time ice-bound fighting for survival.
For
the last 100 years the Northwestern passage was rarely open for a short
period in the summer time. However, in the last 3 years a growing
number of sailing adventurers are traversing this waterway without
meeting any serious ice, even in vessels as small as a 7.5 m long
catamaran such as this: Clearly Arctic ecology is most fragile and
affected by small temperature changes
We asked research scientist Dr. Greg Flato, from the Canadian Centre
for Climate Modeling and Analysis, to share his views on the rapid
melting of Arctic sea ice and its repercussions on the rest of the
globe.
The Centre is located on Vancouver Island near the Pacific coast of
Canada. Dr. Flato's main research focus is global climate modeling,
sea-ice dynamics and thermodynamics, and the role of the cryosphere
meaning the ice areas of the Earth, on climate.
He has published around 50 journal articles and book chapters in the
area of sea-ice and global climate modeling, and was a lead author of a
chapter in the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report
SUPREME MASTER TV:
Hallo, Dr. Flato, thank you for joining us, welcome.
Dr. Flato:
Thank you.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
Today we will be talking about ice, ocean ice. And that is, of course, in the context of global warming.
Many people already agree that we are entering a period of climate
change. Particularly in the Arctic, where the permafrost is melting,
glaciers are receding and sea ice is also disappearing, it becomes a
most dramatic process.
Could you introduce to our viewers how this process actually looks at
this time how much ice do we lose, let’s say within the last 50 years,
where the observations were very accurate?
Dr. Flato:
OK, well maybe I could start first
just by talking about how the climate is changing, and how it’s changing
in the Arctic and what is the driver for the changes that we see in the
ice.
One of the things that’s important to realize is that as the climate
warms as we put more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, the
atmosphere near the surface warms up but that warming isn’t uniform over the globe.
It warms more at the high latitudes particularly in the Arctic,
than it does at the lower latitudes, and the reason for that is that
the sea ice and the snow at the high latitudes are very reflective, they
reflect sunlight and act to cool the climate, whereas at the lower
latitudes the surface is darker.
Now when you start to warm up the climate, that bright surface, the
ice and the snow begin to melt away, and expose the dark underlying
surface, either the ocean or the land.
And that dark surface absorbs more of the solar radiation, acts to warm the climate more which acts to melt more of the ice.
It’s what we call a positive feedback. And so that positive feedback acts to amplify the warming at high latitudes.
Dr. Flato:
So what we see in the temperature
record is that the high latitudes, particularly in the Arctic, have
warmed more than at the lower latitudes.
Then the snow is receding and the sea ice is receding What we’ve seen
from direct observations since the late 1970’s when we have very
accurate satellite measurements of the sea ice, is that the ice cover in
the Arctic has been shrinking year by year.
Dr. Flato:
The area covered by ice, we have very
good observations of, because that’s something we can see directly from
satellites What we see is that the area has been slowly shrinking over
the last 30 years.
The annual average rate has been about 3% per decade decline. In the
Arctic, the ice extent is at its maximum in the winter time, and then
melts back in the summer time, that’s the normal annual cycle.
So if you look at the summer time minimum, the area that’s covered by
ice at its minimum in the summer, that has been declining at a rate of
about 8% per decade over the last 30 years. And in the last 5-10 years
particularly, that rate seems to have been increasing dramatically. And
last summer, the summer of 2007, we saw a record minimum in sea ice
extent in the summer that was much lower than any previous year.
(Image Credit- nasa.gov)
SUPREME MASTER TV:
By how much? Because the alarm just started so much in 2007.
Dr. Flato:
Yes, we have various pictures, you
can get pictures on the internet to look at this I have one figure here
which just shows this, which you maybe can’t see too well here, but it’s
the average summertime [ice] was something like 9 million square
kilometers.
And last summer it was down to about 5, a little over 5.
So a very dramatic reduction of almost a half.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
40%, right?
Dr. Flato:
Yeah, about 40% decline.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
That’s a lot. That’s really very impressive.
HOST:
You’re watching Planet Earth: Our Loving Home on Supreme
Master Television. We continue our discussion with Dr. Greg Flato on the
dramatic Arctic sea ice melt and the climatic consequences thereof.
It has been evidenced that ecological changes accelerate in the Arctic. The average ocean ice-cover in September 2007 was about 40% below of what is expected in an average year, based on the last two decades, and by 23 percent below the previous record low established in September 2005.
Dr. Flato:
So when you look at pictures of the Arctic, a vast area of the western Arctic was completely ice free this past summer.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
That is northern Canada mostly, right?
Dr. Flato:
Yeah, so the Arctic Ocean north of
Canada and between Eastern Siberia, that part of the Arctic Ocean was
almost completely ice free this summer and it is much more rapid than
what climate models have projected was going to happen.
So
that’s got scientists thinking about why it is that the observed ice
extent in the Arctic has been declining much more rapidly than we
expected based on these climate models.
So there’s a lack of understanding right now.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
So these alarming statements came based on
satellite pictures [from] NASA, which you just said neither models could
predict, and scientists like Jay Zwally, for example, started to think
that perhaps we are approaching this tipping point, where things get
amplified, this positive feedback mechanism you just described, works in
a catastrophic form, in a self propelling form, that models, which are
still pretty linear, can not predict.
And the statement was that around 2012, there will be no ice in the Arctic
So the question is, can it come back with a few good winters, or when
it gets to that point is it a permanent change which may last for
hundreds or thousands of years?
What does it mean, that ice will not come back?
Dr. Flato:
Well that’s still an open question.
This past summer, as I said was a remarkably low year for sea ice. And it was a combination of things that led to that.
There is the overall warming of the climate. And naturally as the climate warms, the amount of ice is going to reduce.
But superimposed on that for the last several years the wind in the
Arctic has been rather different than it was historically. The sea ice
floats on top of the ocean and is moved around by the winds and the
ocean current.
And what’s happened over the last few years is that a lot of the ice
has been pushed over to the Eastern part of the Arctic and out into the
North Atlantic.
So it’s a combination of warming and circulation that have led to this anomalous summer.
Dr. Flato:
Now the question is how much of one versus the other.
How much of it is wind versus warming. And is the wind connected with the warming?
These are all open questions at the moment.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
So basically we don’t have tools for prediction at this stage, once this melting became so vast.
Dr. Flato:
That’s correct.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
Because that’s like a new qualitative picture.
Dr. Flato:
Yes, we’re into territory that we haven’t really experienced before.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
So the question is, can it come back with a
few good winters, or when it gets to that point is it a permanent change
which may last for hundreds or thousands of years?
What does it mean, that ice will not come back?
Dr. Flato:
Well that’s still an open question.
This past summer, as I said was a remarkably low year for sea ice. And it was a combination of things that led to that.
There is the overall warming of the climate. And naturally as the climate warms, the amount of ice is going to reduce.
But superimposed on that for the last several years the wind in the
Arctic has been rather different than it was historically. The sea ice
floats on top of the ocean and is moved around by the winds and the
ocean current.
And what’s happened over the last few years is that a lot of the ice
has been pushed over to the Eastern part of the Arctic and out into the
North Atlantic.
So it’s a combination of warming and circulation that have led to this anomalous summer.
Dr Flato:
The winter time ice cover is of course expanding back as it must, as the winter gets colder.
What we will have to wait and see is next summer, whether there was
enough new growth of ice this winter to cause the summer minimum in 2008
to be less dramatic that it was this past summer.
So at the moment we don’t really have the tools to make a very good
prediction of this, because as I mentioned, the models we have are
already unable to predict this.
(Image Credit- nasa.gov)
SUPREME MASTER TV:
What is the role of the Arctic ice and the water exchange with the Arctic Ocean for the global climate?
Dr Flato:
Well, the Arctic is impressive, in a sense, in that it collects water from a large area of the Northern Hemisphere.
So many large rivers from North America and Eurasia drain into the
Arctic. So the drainage basin that drains water into the Arctic is very
large. So what we see in the Arctic is that the surface layer of the Arctic is very fresh compared to most other oceans in the world.
There’s this very fresh surface layer and then a deeper, saltier but warmer layer underneath it. And that
fresh surface layer is important because it keeps the deep warmer ocean
from mixing its heat up to the surface and allows the ice to form every
winter at the surface.
That fresh water gets circulated around in the Arctic driven by the
winds, and it comes out through the North Atlantic, between Greenland
and Spitsbergen, down a current along the east coast of Greenland, and
that fresh water then gets into the North Atlantic, where it affects the
deep convection and the overturning circulation in the North Atlantic.
Dr Flato:
So it plays an
important role in controlling how the circulation in the North Atlantic
works and how the heat is transported from the tropical Atlantic to the
high-latitude Atlantic.
Again it’s an area that we don’t really fully understand, but there
is evidence that when there’s lots of fresh water coming out of the
Arctic, it suppresses this deep mixing in the northern North Atlantic,
and that then has implications for how heat and water are transported in
the Atlantic.
The Atlantic, of course, is an important area in terms of carrying
heat northward that provides warmth to Western Europe, so it does have
an importance that is much larger than its area.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
That's also vertical exchange.
Dr Flato:
That’s right, so where it mixes with the deep ocean it acts to ventilate the deep ocean.
Dr Flato:
This deep circulation in the ocean is important for transporting the nutrients in the ocean, which then, when they come to the surface, supply the nutrients needed to support that plant life in the upper ocean.
The fact that the ice cover is there is important in terms of keeping the Arctic cool, because it reflects solar radiation in the summertime.
And it’s also important in terms of how much exchange there is between the deep water in the Arctic and the surface water.
So there is a connection with the nutrients in the deep water.
So as the sea ice forms, when sea ice forms in the ocean, the salt is
rejected from the ice because the ice that forms is relatively fresh
compared to the ocean, the water in which it forms.
And that salt, as it gets rejected from the ice, is heavy and sinks and promotes mixing in the ocean beneath it.
So if you don’t have ice then you miss that process.
Dr Flato:
We were taught from school age that we were born at the end of the ice age.
The climate of the Earth goes in cycles, that there was some period
of time, maybe 55 million years ago, when even the Arctic Ocean
temperature was above 20˚C.
So why can’t we expect that it would happen again and maybe Greenland
would be green again, and the Arctic would have a moderate climate?
Dr Flato:
Well, I think that it’s clear that the global climate has changed over long time scales.
We have had periods of cold climate, when there were large ice sheets
over much of North America and Eurasia, the so called Ice Ages, and
then warmer periods in between.
We are currently in one of these warm periods in between ice ages.
So it’s certainly clear that the climate varies substantially, just from natural causes.
What is surprising, if you want to put it that way, is the rate at which the climate has changed over the past century.
The warming that we have seen in the 20th
century is much more rapid and much more dramatic than what has been
seen historically in terms of increases of temperature, and it’s
unprecedented, at least according to the observations that we have over the last thousand years, certainly.
So the issue is the speed at which the climate is changing.
And all sorts of components of the climate have to then adjust to this rapid change.
And I think that’s the part that’s unique about the recent change in
climate that we’ve seen, is the pace at which it’s occurring.
Dr Flato:
The estimates are that the large ice
sheets, Greenland and Antarctica, haven’t contributed as much as the
small mountain glaciers over the past century.
But that’s expected to change in the future, as first of all, the mountain glaciers become smaller and smaller and contribute less and less.
But
also there is evidence that the large ice sheets are beginning to drain
their ice into the ocean more rapidly than they have in the past.
HOST:
Through in-depth research on global warming, scientists
have found that the unsustainable development of modern technology is
bringing our planet’s ecosystem into a situation such that no one can
predict the outcome.
Some studies have indicated that the current rate of global warming
is triggering potential dangers, leading to an exacerbation of climate
change.
Dr Flato:
There’s another potential positive feedback, which is as you
warm the climate, you release more of these potent greenhouse gases
like methane, which are stored in frozen form in the present.
So these hydrates, which are generally fairly deep on land, but
fairly shallow under the ocean in the Arctic, there’s the potential to
release those as the ocean warms near the sea floor.
Dr Flato:
On the land, in the permafrost areas,
there’s lots of organic material that’s frozen in permafrost now that as
the permafrost melts, can then begin to decompose.
HOST:
Some scientists are concerned that the release of methane
in the earth’s permafrost and tundra will increase rapidly as the
temperature rises.
According to recent studies, the methane stocks in these areas are so
huge that the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere would at least double
if all these greenhouse gases are emitted, which would be unbearable
for our ecosphere.
Today, the future of humankind and our planet depends on how quickly we can all act to curb further global warming.
Dr Flato:
All I can really say is that what’s
clear from the scientific evidence presented in the IPCC reports is that
the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere which come from the
burning of fossil fuels and other human activities, that is the main
driver of the climate warming that we’ve seen in the latter half of the
20th century.
Dr Flato:
The concentrations of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere have to be reduced in order to effect a reduction in
the rate of warming.
HOST:
Recently, scientific observations have shown that the sun’s
radiation is showing signs of weakening. Scientists hope that this may
partially compensate for the impact of global warming.
SUPREME MASTER TV:
So is there any hope for some stabilizing
cooling process, like recently we heard some statement from NASA solar
astronomers, solar physicists, that maybe the sun's radiation will be
reduced?
Could that stabilize global warming? Or in your view, would this be too small a correction?
Dr Flato:
The results in the IPCC report indicate that
the forcing due to changes in solar radiation are relatively small, and
can’t explain the warming in the past century, that the warming that
we’ve seen is attributable to greenhouse gases and not to solar forcing,
so from that point of view, it would be unlikely that changes in solar
forcing would cause a remarkable reduction in the rate of warming.
Dr Flato:
As I said, the scientific evidence that we have now, as summarized in the IPCC, is that the
warming we’ve seen over the last century is predominantly caused by
greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, which are caused by human
activities.
So that’s what we understand from a scientific point of view.
The warming will continue as long as greenhouse gases keep being emitted; that is what scientific evidence indicates.
HOST:
At present, scientists are working diligently, observing
changes in the Arctic ice layer, along with other factors related to
global warming.